Current:Home > ScamsCalifornia voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls -Horizon Finance School
California voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls
View
Date:2025-04-28 14:58:44
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The California Supreme Court on Thursday removed a measure from the November ballot that would have made it harder to raise taxes, siding with Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies in the state Legislature.
The measure would have required voter approval for tax increases passed by the state Legislature. It also would have raised the threshold required for voter approval of certain local government tax increases to a two-thirds vote at the polls. Currently those tax increases can take affect if a simple majority of voters approve.
The measure would have applied retroactively to most tax increases approved since Jan. 1, 2022. Local governments warned that would mean they could have lost billions of dollars in revenue that had previously been approved by voters.
Newsom has opposed many tax increases during his time in office. But he sued to block this measure, saying it would harm local governments and take away the Legislature’s ability to raise taxes.
Supporters of the ballot measure argued that California has become too expensive and voters need more control over taxes. In a unanimous decision, the court ruled the measure could not be enacted by ballot initiative because it “would substantially alter our basic plan of government.” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote the opinion. “The Supreme Court’s decision to take this dangerous initiative off the ballot avoids a host of catastrophic impacts, protecting billions of dollars for schools, access to reproductive health care, gun safety laws that keep students safe in classrooms, and paid family leave,” said Jonathan Underland, spokesperson for the campaign that opposed the initiative. Removing a qualified measure from the ballot before an election is rare in California, but not unprecedented. The court wrote it was necessary in this case to review the initiative because it would have potentially voided tax increases put in place after Jan. 1, 2022. That may have deprived government of some funding lawmakers were counting on.
veryGood! (32)
Related
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- A digital conflict between Russia and Ukraine rages on behind the scenes of war
- A delivery robot creates a poetic moment in the woods of England
- More than 90,000 hoverboards sold in the U.S. are being recalled over safety concerns
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Cryptocurrency Is An Energy Drain
- One year later, the Atlanta spa shootings; plus, tech on TV
- What Caelynn Miller-Keyes Really Thinks of Dean Unglert's Vasectomy Offer
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- BeReal is Gen Z's new favorite social media app. Here's how it works
Ranking
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- Kim Kardashian's SKIMS Drops 3 Head-Turning Swimsuit Collections
- Netflix lays off several hundred more employees
- Telegram is the app of choice in the war in Ukraine despite experts' privacy concerns
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Tech's crackdown on Russian propaganda is a geopolitical high-wire act
- Tamar Braxton Is Engaged to Queens Court Finalist Jeremy JR Robinson
- U.S. seeks extradition of alleged Russian spy Sergey Cherkasov from Brazil
Recommendation
Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
Vanderpump Rules' Ariana Madix Breaks Silence on Tom Sandoval and Raquel Leviss Scandal
Aly & AJ Explain Their Sacred Bond in Potentially the Sweetest Interview Ever
Spotlight On Wander Beauty: Why Women Everywhere Love the Female-Founded Beauty Line
Sam Taylor
U.S. seeks extradition of alleged Russian spy Sergey Cherkasov from Brazil
Second pastor in Kenya accused of mass killing of his followers
Church of England says single people should be valued, Jesus was single